WFU
顯示具有 low back pain 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 low back pain 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2026年4月23日 星期四

Is PRP and electromagnetic therapy actually effective? Take a look at the X-ray changes in a 74-year-old woman after treatment.

 

Last March, Dr. Huang shared the case of a 73-year-old woman with lower back pain accompanied by leg numbness.
Her X-rays revealed lumbar scoliosis, spondylolisthesis, and stenosis (in fact, her cervical spine also had problems).

Following Dr. Huang’s recommendations, she underwent several sessions of PRP injections along with high-intensity focused electromagnetic (HIFEM) therapy.

Due to work commitments requiring her to frequently stay in the United States, her treatment schedule was irregular.
Her last PRP injection was in August 2025; then she returned to the U.S.
She didn’t come back until this April.

The first thing she did upon returning was to visit Dr. Huang for maintenance of her spine and other joints.
(She also has rotator cuff tears in the shoulder and degenerative knee joints, both treated by Dr. Huang.)

The patient reported that during her time abroad, she experienced almost no lower back pain, with only occasional mild leg numbness.


Dr. Huang arranged a follow-up spinal X-ray at Chung Shan Hospital, which showed clear improvement compared to previous images:

  • The degree of scoliosis was significantly reduced (Figure 1)
  • Spondylolisthesis and foraminal stenosis also showed improvement (Figure 2)

With objective X-ray evidence to support the results, the patient gained greater confidence in the treatment and chose to continue PRP therapy.

She joked that every time she sees me, she feels both happy and scared—
happy because her problems can be treated,
but scared because it means more injections
😅 (she is very afraid of needles).

So each time, she opts for a larger-volume PRP injection (Figure 3),
which allows her to reduce the number of visits 
😆


Many people ask: Do PRP and electromagnetic therapies actually work?
Many patients also wonder: Can degenerated or damaged structures be “reversed” or “repaired”—even just a little?


The answer is realistic—
not everyone experiences dramatic results.

However, with the right physician, proper indications, good patient compliance, and sufficient treatment dosage,
these therapies can indeed change the course of a disease.

This 74-year-old patient did not undergo intensive treatment
and even spent more than half a year abroad.

Yet with appropriate regenerative therapy combined with electromagnetic treatment,
the X-rays still provided an answer:

Degeneration does not have to be a one-way decline.

What we can do
is not only slow it down, but sometimes even improve it.

This is what Dr. Huang has always aimed to do:
use scientific methods to restore the body as much as possible.

PRP and electromagnetic therapies are not miracle cures,
but they can shift a future that once seemed destined to worsen.


As for fear of injections?
Of course she’s afraid 
😆
Yet she keeps coming back.

Because compared to the injections,
she understands something even more important:

Some pain
doesn’t have to be endured for a lifetime.


Previous report:
https://uroprolo.blogspot.com/2025/03/ultrasound-guided-prolotherapy-for.html

 

2024年5月14日 星期二

體外震波-比傳統復健有效且免打針的治療-下背痛篇

 

下背痛是個盛行率相當高的疾病

根據統計

約八成的成人在一生中都曾經有過下背痛的困擾

 

下背痛的治療方式很多元

從傳統保守治療(運動訓練、物理治療、藥物治療等)

到具有侵入性的治療(針灸、乾針、激痛點注射、增生療法注射治療)

乃至嚴重時需要的手術治療

然而

對於有頑固下背痛疾病但又還不需開刀/不想開刀的病人

傳統保守治療效果不佳

侵入性治療又望之卻步

有沒有其他治療選擇呢?

 

答案是有的!

那就是體外震波!

 

體外震波由於其刺激組織修復再生、緩解疼痛的特性

在骨復健領域的應用廣泛

傳統上

震波治療的適應症

以四肢淺層的組織為主(ex:上下肢肌腱病變、足底筋膜炎...)

但事實上
有越來越多的臨床證據顯示

體外震波在治療身體中軸、較深層相關病變亦有相當療效

今天

黃醫師就帶大家瀏覽一下

目前體外震波治療下背痛的醫學證據以及臨床效果如何

 

1.Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 29;102(52):e36596. (IF: 1.552)

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38206739/

 

這是一篇回顧性研究

從六百多篇體外震波治療下背痛相關文獻

篩選出22 個隨機對照研究、共1749名患者

進行統合分析

比較體外震波跟其他療法治療下背痛的效果

 

治療組:體外震波治療

對照組:包含運動療法、激痛點注射、超音波療法、熱療法、電療、磁熱振動、針灸、口服藥物(Kinesitherapy, Trigger point injection, Ultrasound therapy, Thermal therapy, TENS, Magneto-thermo- vibration, acupuncture, Oral drugs)

另外這篇研究還特別整理出各文獻下背痛的病因(pathogenesis)

比如肌筋膜與韌帶、薦髂關節、椎間盤、椎體、小面關節 (Myofascia and ligaments, SI joint, Intervertebral disc, vertebral body, Facet joint)

 

結果:

跟對照組相比

體外震波治療下背痛

疼痛VAS, ODI 殘障指數和Beck 憂鬱量表分數較低

指地距離較短

日本骨科協會評分JOAs較高

 

3 個月追蹤時

VAS 和 ODI 仍較低

不良反應較少

有效病例更多

 

結論:

與其他療法相比

體外震波治療下背痛在改善疼痛、功能障礙和心理狀況方面具有有效性和安全性

在長期療效方面顯示出優勢

 

2.Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 632 patients 

J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18: 455. (IF: 2.677)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10290808/

 

一樣是體外震波對下背痛治療的回顧性研究

與上一篇不同的是

這篇聚焦在「慢性下背痛」(下背痛超過三個月)

 

本篇從180多篇文獻

篩選出12 個隨機對照研究、共632名患者

進行統合分析

比較體外震波跟其他療法治療慢性下背痛的效果

 

治療組:體外震波

對照組:運動- 體能訓練、伸展練習(膕繩肌、髂腰肌和背部伸肌)、橋式...

雷射治療、激痛點注射、肌肉注射(0 mg triamcinolone + 2 mL lidocaine 2%)、熱敷、超音波與電療、肌筋膜激痛療法、口服藥物。

(Exercise - Physical exercise, Stretching exercises (hamstrings, iliopsoas, and back extensors), Bridging, adductor ball squeeze, abdominal marching, reverse curl-ups exercise (50 min), Williams’ exercises and McKenzie’s exercise

Laser therapeutic, Trigger point injection, muscle injection (40 mg triamcinolone + 2 mL lidocaine 2%), Hot packs, ultrasound and electrotherapy, Myofascial trigger therapy, Oral medications,.)

 

結果:

與其他傳統治療相比

體外震波治療下背痛

疼痛、 ODI 殘障指數顯著改善

 

結論:

與其他治療措施相比

體外震波可以更好地緩解疼痛並改善腰椎功能障礙

且沒有嚴重不良反應

 

3.Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Treating Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Biomed Res Int. 2021 Nov 15:2021:5937250. 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34840977/

 

比前兩篇更早的回顧性研究

本篇篩選出10 個隨機對照試驗、共 455 名年輕至中年患者(29.2-55.8 歲)

統合分析比較體外震波跟其他療法治療慢性下背痛的效果

結論:慢性下背痛患者使用體外震波可在短期內顯著且可量化地減少疼痛和殘疾

 

 

黃醫師結語:

對於廣大下背痛的族群

傳統保守治療(運動訓練、物理治療、藥物治療)仍是目前治療的主力

然而

傳統保守治療有以下缺點─

運動訓練:姿勢不標準、堅持性差

物理治療:難達到長期鎮痛效果

藥物治療:可能伴隨噁心、便秘、疲倦等副作用

而侵入性治療並不是每個病人都能接受

因此

效果更好又不具侵入性的治療

是許多病人心裡的渴望

 

體外震波是再生治療的主力之一

除了促進組織修復及止痛的特性

又不具有針劑的侵入性

可譽為「不打針的PRP」

除了骨復健領域

泌尿科也有廣泛的應用(包括男性勃起功能障礙的治療)

 

傳統上

體外震波治療以四肢淺層組織為主

原因是可以較容易地將震波聚集在欲治療的標的(target)

而下背痛牽涉的組織病變從淺層到深層都有可能

範圍也較廣(從肋骨下緣到屁股下緣)

因此增加了震波治療的難度

不過即使如此

初步的研究依然肯定了體外震波在下背痛的療效

黃醫師認為

如何將治療過程更優化

達到更精準、更有效的治療

將是未來研究的重點

也呼籲所有下背痛的病患

現代醫學已有相當多元的治療方式

及早接受治療、選擇適合自己的治療方式

就能儘早恢復健康、讓疼痛遠離!

 

門診資訊


Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy - Effective and Needle-Free Treatment for Low Back Pain


Low back pain is a highly prevalent condition, with statistics showing that approximately eighty percent of adults have experienced it at some point in their lives.

 

There are various treatment modalities for low back pain, ranging from traditional conservative therapies such as exercise training, physical therapy, and medication, to invasive treatments like acupuncture, dry needling, trigger point injections, and surgical intervention when severe. 

However, for patients with stubborn low back pain who do not require or prefer to avoid surgery, traditional conservative treatments may be ineffective, and invasive treatments may be intimidating. 

Are there other treatment options available?

 

The answer is yes! 

That's where extracorporeal shockwave therapy comes in!

 

Due to its ability to stimulate tissue repair and regeneration and alleviate pain, extracorporeal shockwave therapy has found widespread application in the field of musculoskeletal rehabilitation. 

Traditionally, shockwave therapy has been primarily indicated for superficial tissue pathologies of the limbs (e.g., tendon disorders of the upper and lower limbs, plantar fasciitis). 

However, increasing clinical evidence suggests that extracorporeal shockwave therapy is also effective in treating central and deeper tissue-related pathologies within the body.

 

Today, Dr. Huang will go through the current medical evidence and clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy for low back pain.

 

1.Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 29;102(52):e36596. (IF: 1.552)

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38206739/

 

This retrospective study analyzed over 600 articles related to extracorporeal shockwave therapy for low back pain, selecting 22 randomized controlled trials involving 1749 patients for integrated analysis. 

The study compared the effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy with other traditional treatments (Kinesitherapy, Trigger point injection, Ultrasound therapy, Thermal therapy, TENS, Magneto-thermo- vibration, acupuncture, Oral drugs) for low back pain. 

 

Results showed that compared to the control group, patients receiving extracorporeal shockwave therapy had lower pain scores on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), lower Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, lower Beck Depression Inventory scores, shorter finger-to-ground distances, and higher Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores. 

At the three-month follow-up, patients receiving shockwave therapy continued to show lower VAS and ODI scores, fewer adverse reactions, and more effective cases.

 

Conclusion: Extracorporeal shockwave therapy for low back pain demonstrates efficacy and safety in improving pain, functional disability, and psychological conditions compared to other therapies, showing long-term advantages in efficacy.

 

2.Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 632 patients 

J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18: 455. (IF: 2.677)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10290808/

 

This systematic review and meta-analysis focused on chronic low back pain (lasting over three months), selecting 12 randomized controlled trials involving 632 patients from over 180 articles. 

The study compared the effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy with other treatments [Exercise, Laser, Trigger point injection, muscle injection (40 mg triamcinolone + 2 mL lidocaine 2%), Hot packs, ultrasound and electrotherapy, Myofascial trigger therapy, Oral medications] for chronic low back pain. 

 

Results indicated significant improvements in pain and ODI disability index scores with extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared to traditional treatments.

 

Conclusion: Extracorporeal shockwave therapy is more effective in relieving pain and improving lumbar spine dysfunction compared to other treatment modalities, with no serious adverse reactions.

 

3.Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Treating Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Biomed Res Int. 2021 Nov 15:2021:5937250. 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34840977/

 

This earlier retrospective study screened 10 randomized controlled trials involving 455 young to middle-aged patients (29.2-55.8 years) to compare the effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy with other treatments for chronic low back pain. 

The conclusion was that patients with chronic low back pain using extracorporeal shockwave therapy showed significant and quantifiable reductions in pain and disability in the short term.

 

Dr. Huang's Conclusion:

For the vast population suffering from low back pain, traditional conservative treatments such as exercise training, physical therapy, and medication remain the mainstay of treatment. 

However, these traditional conservative treatments have the following limitations─

Exercise training: poor adherence; incorrect posture and lack of persistence

Physical therapy: difficulty in achieving long-term pain relief

Medication therapy: potential side effects such as nausea, constipation, and fatigue

Moreover, invasive treatments may not be acceptable for every patient. 

Therefore, a treatment that is both more effective and non-invasive is desired by many patients.

 

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy, known for its regenerative properties and pain relief without the invasiveness of needles, can be considered a "needle-free PRP."

In addition to its application in musculoskeletal rehabilitation, it has wide-ranging applications in urology, including the treatment of male erectile dysfunction.

 

Traditionally, extracorporeal shockwave therapy has primarily targeted superficial tissue pathologies due to the ease of targeting the shockwaves.

However, low back pain involves pathologies ranging from superficial to deep tissues, making treatment more challenging. 

Nevertheless, preliminary studies have affirmed the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy for low back pain.

Dr. Huang believes that optimizing the treatment process to achieve more precise and effective therapy will be the focus of future research. 

I urge all low back pain patients to consider the diverse treatment options available in modern medicine to achieve early recovery and alleviate pain.

 

Outpatient Clinic Information