WFU
顯示具有 ESWT 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 ESWT 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2026年6月2日 星期二

體外震波必知3件事

 


#仁醫說

過去,多數人認為 #勃起功能障礙 是老年人的專利,但是在高壓的時代中,其實,越來越多的青壯年時時常支吾的跑進我的診間:「醫師,我的晨勃減少是正常的嗎?」、「最近有點力不從心,無法精準上膛,這個有解嗎?」


根據「男性醫學會」過去的調查,完全可以了解,大家的「男」言之隱

勃起功能障礙:40歲以上約17%50歲以上約31%60歲以上男性約44%

面對勃起功能障礙(ED),除了吃藥,其中,「 #低能量體外震波 」已經成為熱門的治療新選擇,但是在資訊爆炸、滿天飛的時代,即使做足了功課,相信還是很多

人一頭霧水,以下幫大家整理出必知的3件事。


「低能量體外震波」必知的3件事

Q1:機型琳瑯滿目,哪一台最好?

A:不挑神機,只挑「衛福部核准」!無論是電磁式、水電式或壓電式,臨床都已證實療效。

民眾不必糾結機器品牌,認明有衛福部核准的合法醫材最重要。


Q2:打越多、能量越強就越有效?

A:錯!它是「誘發」再生,足量即可,最重要的是必須由專業醫師評估,根據每個人當下的病症狀況,客製化調整最適合、最安全的脈衝參數,才能安全又有效。


Q3:像壯陽藥一樣,有需要才去打嗎?

A:不是!它是「根本修復」,需要完整療程。這不是行房前的救火藥,而是幫血管重新生長。一般完整療程為每週12次,連續612次,效果會隨著時間逐漸顯現。

不管是幾世代,有問題別逃避,及早尋求專業評估,才能真正找回自信與幸福!


#黃柏仁醫師

#男言之隱

2026年2月23日 星期一

體外震波治療男性力不從心相關迷思 Common Myths About Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction

 

1.    男性力不從心,只能靠吃藥,而且不可能根治?

Is male impotence something that can only be treated with medication, and is it impossible to cure completely?

https://youtu.be/1Qw1G5_k_SA?si=VgvgAVu5tjlLM5rz

 

https://uroprolo.blogspot.com/2023/05/blog-post.html

https://uroprolo.blogspot.com/2023/05/can-erectile-dysfunction-be-treated.html

 

2.    年輕人也需要震波治療嗎?

Do young men also need shockwave therapy?

https://youtube.com/shorts/3-6gWlnkn18?si=KO0xAfMhCvOp-oJy

 

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1C3jaFZ1yD/?mibextid=wwXIfr

 

3.    要打幾次才會有效?打的越痛、效果就越好嗎?

How many treatment sessions are needed to see results?
Is more pain associated with better outcomes?

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1DF6DU2G6s/?mibextid=wwXIfr

 

https://uroprolo.blogspot.com/2023/05/blog-post.html

https://uroprolo.blogspot.com/2023/05/can-erectile-dysfunction-be-treated.html

 

4.    是不是發數越多、能量越強,效果就越好?

Do higher pulse counts and stronger energy levels lead to better results?

 

https://youtube.com/shorts/GonfQTmipoo?si=dWiS7y6vH4hneHOg

 

https://uroprolo.blogspot.com/2024/08/blog-post.html

https://uroprolo.blogspot.com/2024/08/extracorporeal-shock-wave-therapy-more.html

 

5.    有哪一臺震波機器效果特別好嗎?打的越深效果就越好嗎?

Is there any shockwave machine that works particularly better?
Does deeper penetration mean better effectiveness?

http://youtube.com/shorts/TXFj7bwe6W8

 

https://uroprolo.blogspot.com/2026/02/blog-post_23.html

https://uroprolo.blogspot.com/2026/02/if-shockwave-therapy-is-effective-for.html

 

 

If Shockwave Therapy Is Effective for Erectile Dysfunction, Is There One Machine That Works Better Than the Others?


Short answer: No.


First of all, Dr. Huang has personally used the three types of extracorporeal shockwave systems mentioned below, and all have demonstrated good clinical outcomes. None has been shown to be superior to the others.


More importantly, based on current evidence-based medicine:

🔹 Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) can be broadly divided into focused and radial types. In the treatment of male erectile dysfunction, focused shockwave therapy is generally the primary modality used.

🔹 Focused shockwave therapy can be further categorized into three main types:

  • Electromagnetic (EM)
  • Piezoelectric (PE)
  • Electrohydraulic (EH)

All three modalities have been shown to be effective in treating erectile dysfunction. At present, there are no head-to-head comparative studies demonstrating that one type is more effective than the others. Therefore, patients do not need to overly focus on differences between machines; any device approved by the Ministry of Health and Welfare for the appropriate indication can be considered a valid treatment option.


📌 Key Points from Current Evidence

1.    Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (LI-ESWT) has evidence supporting its ability to improve vasculogenic erectile dysfunction (ED) by enhancing blood flow and promoting tissue repair.

2.    Most systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials focus on the effectiveness of LI-ESWT itself, rather than on specific brands or machine models.

3.    Some studies compare different shockwave modalities (focused vs radial), but because these techniques are fundamentally different, the overall body of evidence remains limited.


📌 Current Published Medical Literature

(PubMed / Systematic Reviews / Cochrane Reviews)

There are no randomized controlled trials or meta-analyses that directly compare different focused shockwave systems and demonstrate the superiority of one over another.


📌 Therefore, the Evidence Can Be Summarized as Follows:

 Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (LI-ESWT) is effective for treating vasculogenic erectile dysfunction and certain chronic tendon or soft-tissue conditions.
 Is any specific shockwave system better than the others? → There is currently no strong clinical evidence to support such a claim.


📌 In Clinical Practice, When Treating Erectile Dysfunction, Physicians Are Often More Concerned About:

👉 What treatment options are available and suitable for the individual patient
👉 Whether the patient’s lifestyle factors (diet, exercise, smoking, alcohol use) are beneficial or harmful
👉 The presence of chronic diseases and how well they are controlled
👉 The patient’s ability to adhere to treatment in order to achieve optimal outcomes


References

https://uroweb.org/guidelines/sexual-and-reproductive-health/chapter/management-of-erectile-dysfunction

https://www.auanet.org/guidelines-and-quality/guidelines/erectile-dysfunction-(ed)-guideline


Postscript

🔹 The motivation for writing this article comes from the fact that many clinics claim their shockwave machines are superior to others. While self-promotion is understandable, as a medical professional I feel obligated to state the facts—especially when certain heavily advertised shockwave systems claim to be “more effective than other shockwaves,” a statement that is not supported by medical evidence. Someone has to clarify this.

🔹 If it were merely advertising, I might not have noticed. However, a large number of patients repeatedly ask me about these claims and even show me the advertisements they have seen. Because this has become so common, I decided to write this article to address the issue directly.

🔹 Axxa Duo” is an electrohydraulic shockwave system. There is currently no clinical evidence demonstrating that Axxa Duo is more effective or superior to other shockwave therapies.

  

2024年10月26日 星期六

2024年10月20日 星期日

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy: More is Not Always Better – A Focus on Knee Osteoarthritis

 

In the previous article, it has been mentioned that many patients have misconceptions about extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), believing that more shock wave pulses lead to better outcomes. 

The article also discussed the effects of pulse count in the treatment of erectile dysfunction based on literature. 

Naturally, there will be questions about whether the number of pulses also yields similar results in soft tissue treatments.

 

Currently, there is a lack of double-blind comparative studies specifically examining the effects of different pulse counts in soft tissue treatments. 

However, there is indeed a study exploring the treatment effects of varying pulse counts and energy intensities in knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

 

This paper investigated the impact of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) at different energy intensities and pulse counts on pain relief and functional improvement in KOA.

The study divided participants into four treatment groups: 

low intensity (0.12 mJ/mm²) with 2000 pulses, low intensity with 4000 pulses, high intensity (0.24 mJ/mm²) with 2000 pulses, and high intensity with 4000 pulses, along with a control group (0.02 mJ/mm² with 1000 pulses). 

All groups received treatment once a week for a total of four sessions.

 

The main findings of the study showed that:

Energy intensity significantly affects pain relief and functional improvement: high-intensity treatment was clearly more effective than low-intensity.

The pulse count had a relatively minor impact on treatment efficacy

    there was no significant difference in pain relief between 2000 and 4000 pulses, and statistically, the 2000 pulses showed slightly better results for pain relief than 4000

     In terms of functional improvement, pulse count had some influence, with 4000 pulses performing slightly better than 2000, but the difference was not substantial.

 

In summary, the intensity of the shock waves has a greater influence on the effectiveness of treatment for knee osteoarthritis than the number of pulses.

 






Commentary from Dr. Huang: 

As a pain management physician, I understand patients’ desire to pursue better outcomes to alleviate pain. 

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy is indeed a valuable tool for tissue repair and pain reduction. 

However, patients should understand that in soft tissue treatment, the key to successful therapy lies in the appropriate intensity of the shock waves rather than blindly increasing the number of pulses. 

Overemphasizing pulse counts may not only fail to enhance efficacy but could also lead to unnecessary treatment time and costs.

 

In reality, the moderate intensity treatments suggested in the study (0.12 to 0.24 mJ/mm²) can effectively relieve pain and improve function, making them more tolerable for patients. 

When it comes to treating soft tissue conditions, it is important not to blindly believe that "more pulses equal better outcomes." 

Appropriate treatment often leads to optimal results, which is key to successful therapy!

  

體外震波在各種軟組織的作用 【The effects of extracorporeal shock waves on various soft tissues】

以下內容節錄自 Best practices for extracorporeal shockwave therapy in musculoskeletal medicine: Clinical application and training consideration

The following content is excerpted fromBest practices for extracorporeal shockwave therapy in musculoskeletal medicine: Clinical application and training consideration

 

【肌腱】

減少肌腱內的水腫和發炎細胞浸潤

透過機械刺激轉化為生化訊號進行組織再生

增加轉化 beta-1 生長因子和類胰島素生長因子 I insulin‐like growth factor  I )的濃度,以刺激肌腱細胞和膠原蛋白增殖(對癒合很重要)

●Scleraxis轉錄因子上調(促進肌腱生長和發育):

   -抗發炎細胞因子的增殖

   -腱源性肌腱細胞的增生和遷移增加

   -金屬蛋白酶表現減少(可以降解膠原蛋白的酵素)

   -減少發炎性白細胞介素

 

【骨頭】

蛋白質上調--> 可能增強骨骼的血管生成和新血管形成

透過生長因子的釋放進行成骨和骨重塑

   -骨形態發生蛋白2 (Bone morphogenic protein 2)

   -血管內皮生長因子

促進骨膜骨形成

  -破骨細胞活性降低

  -成骨細胞活性增加

 

【關節(膝)】

減少發炎

減少水腫

軟骨下骨(subchondral bone)結構的改善

軟骨細胞活性增加(軟骨修復)

 

【痙攣】

減少肌肉和神經肌肉接合處的痙攣

降低結締組織(肌肉層面)的僵硬性

刺激一氧化氮的合成

  -神經肌肉接合處(Neuromuscular junction)的形成

  -新生血管形成



有關體外震波的原理,請參照這篇文章

For the principles of ESWT, please refer to this article.